Friday, October 17, 2014

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: What The District Is Not Addressing

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: What The District Is Not Addressing



Real Life Statistics

According to a National Autistic Society survey of over 450 children and adults with autism, an astonishing 70% of adults with autism are unable to live independently. Of these individuals, 49% live with family members, creating a huge financial burden on aging parents, and 32% live in residential care facilities, which offer little or no privacy, autonomy, or stimulation.
Only 3% of adults with autism live fully independently. In terms of employment, only 6% of adults hold paid, full-time jobs. Regarding mental health, over half of adults with autism have been diagnosed with depression some time in their adult life while 11% say they have suffered a "nervous breakdown."

And even though the majority of adults surveyed had participated in at least two autism interventions in childhood, 65% continue having difficulty making friends. Of teens surveyed, 74% stated that they had difficulty making friends. Of children under 13 years old, 31% participated in no social activities at all.

Clearly this data shows the burden on quality of life for adults with autism, issues such as independence, self-determination, employment, mental health, social support, and meaningful relationships are virtually ignored when planning treatments, assessing treatment outcomes, or evaluating an overall program’s effectiveness.





Adults with autism are in need of treatment programs which focus on improving family life, self-perception, self-esteem, confidence, ability to compete in employment opportunities, the ability to live in the least restrictive environment, ability to decrease depression, anxiety, and other mental health concerns, for more successful outcomes.

Monday, October 13, 2014

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: Education Law Center | Bullying

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: Education Law Center | Bullying



BULLYING

According to national survey results, bullying affects approximately 30% of students in the United States, whether they are bullies, targets, or both. Bullying may be physical (hitting or punching), verbal (name-calling or teasing), emotional (intimidation through gestures or social exclusion), or, increasingly, cyberbullying (sending insults or threats through electronic communication). Research shows that by creating a climate of fear and disrespect in schools and adversely impacting student learning, bullying negatively impacts not only those directly involved, but also the bystanders to this behavior. Those who are bullied are more likely to suffer from depression, anxiety, and thoughts of suicide, while those who bully are at risk of other antisocial or violent behavior.
New Jersey school districts have been officially required to take measures to prevent and respond to bullying since 2002, when the State's first anti-bullying statute, N.J.S.A. 18A:37-13, was enacted.  In 2007, in L.W. v. Toms River Regional Schools Board of Education, which ELC joined as an amicus, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that a school district can be sued for damages, under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), for not responding reasonably to bias-based student-on-student bullying and harassment that creates a hostile educational environment. Relief under the LAD is limited to students who are targeted for bullying based on a characteristic protected by the law, such as race, gender, sexual orientation, or disability.
Following the L.W. decision, the State created the New Jersey Commission on Bullying in Schools to study and recommend ways to strengthen New Jersey's approach to the problem.  Through its active participation in the New Jersey Coalition for Bullying Awareness and Prevention, a coalition of advocacy organizations, government agencies, and service providers whose goal is to eliminate bullying in New Jersey's schools, ELC was invited to serve on the law committee established to advise the Commission.
The Commission issued a comprehensive report in 2009, establishing a road map for the legal and policy reforms needed to combat bullying in New Jersey's schools.  That report heavily influenced the drafting of New Jersey's "Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act," which was signed into law on January 5, 2011 and is considered to be the strongest anti-bullying legislation in the country.

Current Issues

Under the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act, effective in the 2011-2012 school year, all New Jersey school districts must strengthen their standards and procedures for preventing, reporting, investigating and responding to incidents of harassment, intimidation, and bullying (HIB) of students, both in school and off school premises.  In addition, school districts must comply with enhanced public reporting and training requirements, appoint an Anti-Bullying Specialist and Safety Team at every school, and appoint an Anti-Bullying Coordinator for every district.  The Department of Education also has increased responsibilities under the law, including requirements to investigate HIB complaints that have not been adequately addressed at the local level and to create and administer a Bullying Prevention Fund.
ELC priorities in this area include education about and enforcement of the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights, providing legal assistance in bullying and harassment cases, and expanding a pool of trained attorneys willing to handle cases pro bono on behalf of children who are bullied in school.

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: Erosion of Our Rights

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: Erosion of Our Rights



The District wants the Missouri Human Rights Act to be realigned with Federal Standards in their self-serving way as Legislative Priority 8 states but when it comes to everything else basically, they want the Feds to butt out.

I think we need to work together to get Legislative Priority Item 8 removed from the Legislative Platforms of the 30 school district members of the CSDGKC. 



I would like to see that patrons understand that LSR7 Legislative Platform PRIORITY POSITION #8 HAS NO EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE.  I do not want my tax dollars used to erode civil and human rights of the citizens of Missouri.  I believe the CSDGKC and LSR7 are getting too involved in politics considering the purpose of both is supposed to be EDUCATION.   

The Cooperating School Districts of Greater Kansas City (CSDGKC Inc.) operates as a Missouri EDUCATIONAL Service Agency (ESA).  A CSDGKC sister  organization, the CSDGKC Foundation holds 501(c)(3) status.  In order to provide consistency and continuity, the board of directors for the CSDGKC Foundation is the same as the CSDGKC board.


CSDGKC Inc. is a  diverse, accomplished educational cooperative association.  CSDGKC represents 29 school districts and provides cutting-edge, state-of-the-art collaborative professional development services to another 19 school districts or schools.  CSDGKC serves rural, suburban, and urban communities from 13 Missouri Counties.  We represent over 188,000 students and 30,000 employees.  CSDGKC Inc. is governed by public  school districts in Bates, Buchanan, Caldwell, Cass, Clay, Clinton, Jackson, Johnson, Lafayette, Platte, and  Ray Counties.
Adrian R-III School
Archie R-V School District
Belton School District #124
Blue Springs School District
Center School District 
Excelsior Springs School District 

Fort Osage R-1 School District

Grain Valley School District
Grandview C-4 Schools
Harrisonville Schools
Hickman Mills C-1 School District 
Independence School District
Kansas City Public Schools
Kearney R-1 School District 

Lathrop R-II Schools
Lee’s Summit R-7 School District 
Liberty Public Schools

Lone Jack C6 Public Schools
North Kansas City Schools
Oak Grove R-VI School District
Park Hill School District
Platte County School District
Pleasant Hill R-III School District
Raymore-Peculiar School District 
Raytown School District 

Richmond R-XVI School District

St. Joseph School District 
Smithville R-II School District 

West Platte School District
Missouri Human Rights Act to federal standards.  It isn't to benefit education and students, it is to shield administrators from financial accountability for their acts of discrimination.  It is also to please the school district's business donors and please the local Chamber of Commerce.  This will make it hard to prove discrimination even when that is what has happened.  The erosion of the Missouri Human Rights Act is a big step back in civil rights progress made in this country.  This is why it is critical to spread the word in our communities that we as Patrons/Stakeholders want this removed from the Legislative Platform of our school district.  This impacts school populations and all people who experience discrimination in their jobs, housing and public accommodations in the state of Missouri.  This change in the MHRA will impact all who experience discrimination in Missouri.

The Missouri Commission on Human Rights will take your charge and investigate the alleged discrimination, harassment ... If they find discrimination, then they will either help the parties settle or if the MCHR feels they should have a hearing about the case, they do that.  The parents of the child or the school employee who experienced discrimination, does not have to file a lawsuit, they don't have to hire an attorney.  The MCHR helps with all of this, holding the person and entity involved responsible for the discrimination if they find that in the case.  The school district's officials will be shielded from financial liability if the MHRA is eroded.  Governor Nixon has vetoed Bills two times.  Schools are using their Legislative websites to promote their agenda, which includes #8. 

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Missouri’s Common Core rewrite off to a ragged start | The Kansas City Star

Missouri’s Common Core rewrite off to a ragged start | The Kansas City Star



The teams trying to rewrite Missouri’s learning standards can only hope things go smoother from here.
The political storms over the Common Core State Standards that propelled the Missouri legislature’s decision to re-examine the state’s learning targets has given way to a “logistical nightmare.”
In all, 132 educators and parents in eight panels are supposed to be in place Monday morning in Jefferson City to begin their work.
In a perfect world, they’d have been recruited weeks ago, be prepped and ready — with the costs of meals, lodging and transportation covered in return for their commitments to the many hours of labor ahead.
But as late as Friday, legislative and department staffs charged with putting the teams together were still completing their lists.
The fact that the bill that lawmakers passed last spring to create the process made no provisions for funding it isn’t helping the recruiting. Individuals or the agencies and school districts sending them are having to pay their own way.
The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, which is convening the initial work session, was scrambling late in the week to see whether it could equip the eight meeting rooms for conference calls, because many recruits eager to serve said they can’t be in Jefferson City that first day.
The department wanted to send panel members background materials and forms to begin organizing their thoughts, department spokeswoman Sarah Potter said.
Instead, the process is caught in a “problematic” situation where team members are rushing to make hotel arrangements and other preparations.
“Coordinating has become a logistical nightmare,” she said.
The panelists have enough on their minds already as they seek common ground between Common Core supporters, who hope to affirm the work most school districts have done adapting curriculum to the standards, and those who oppose the standards and want significant changes.
“It’s a big list,” said Todd Scott, chief of staff to Senate President Pro Tem Tom Dempsey, whose office is designated to provide 32 names. “We’re soliciting a wide variety of viewpoints. To get buy-in, you really need a diverse amount of thought in the room.”
The education department began calling on the offices responsible for appointing work teams immediately after Gov. Jay Nixon signed the bill into law in mid-July, Potter said. The state optimistically set an Aug. 1 target date for getting names.
It has proved difficult. Despite the costs and hassle, however, plenty of people are eager to be involved.
The Kearney School District is sending one of its top reading teachers, Ida Cessna, because “it is an important-enough issue for schools,” Superintendent Bill Nicely said.
“We feel we can pay our own way to have someone who can communicate well and provide a better understanding,” he said. “She’s not going to be a fly on the wall. She’s going to speak her mind.”
Fort Osage is sending high school English teacher Lindsay Thompson, who has been sharing Common Core-adapted lesson plans and strategies as part of the BetterLesson Master Teacher Project.
“I’m passionate that high standards stay in place,” she said. And though she supports Common Core, “it’s not a perfect document,” she said. “Could they be developed further? Sure they can.”
Cessna also figures there is room for improvement but hopes the work groups focus on making effective changes that keep the standards in place.
“I’ll be devastated if they are thrown out and we have to start all over,” she said.
Jaimie Shaver of Lamar, Mo., is one of the parents making the trip to Jefferson City. She comes with her work with the Missouri Coalition Against Common Core as part of her background.
“It’s important for Missouri to own our standards again,” Shaver said.
While she hopes the process will essentially start from scratch, that doesn’t mean the opposing ideologies can’t arrive at a common destination.
“I want to help advocate between teachers and parents,” she said. “We can make compromises, but everyone needs to see the whole picture.”
Under the law, Dempsey’s office is picking 16 educators and 16 parents, as is House Speaker Tim Jones’ office.
Those picking eight educators each are Nixon’s office, Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder’s office, Missouri Commissioner of Higher Education David R. Russell’s office, the Missouri School Boards’ Association, the Missouri Association of School Administrators, professional teachers’ organizations and teacher preparation programs.
Twelve members are being submitted from career and technical education organizations.
The panelists will be divided among four subjects — English language arts, math, science and social studies — with 16 in each working on standards for kindergarten through the fifth grade, and 17 in each working on standards for grades six through 12.
The Common Core standards, established through a coalition of most states’ governors and chief education officers, set learning targets for math and English language arts. Forty-four states, including Missouri and Kansas, signed on, but some have pulled out as debate has heated up.
Kansas and Missouri, so far, have remained essentially Common Core states, though Missouri’s position will depend on the work of the panelists over the next year.
It’s time to step past the political struggles of opposing advocacy groups and split legislative chambers, said Chris Howard, deputy legislative director for Jones, who has been rounding up panelists.
“The politics came before,” Howard said, “and now it’s about policy. As a parent I’m concerned that this process works. I’m interested in a good outcome, not a political outcome.”







Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/news/government-politics/article2196869.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Disturbing Facebook Video Shows Police Manhandling 13-Year-Old Autistic Boy | The Free Thought Project

Disturbing Facebook Video Shows Police Manhandling 13-Year-Old Autistic Boy | The Free Thought Project



Lee's Summit has done this to it's autistic students.  They have had children arrested and handcuffed for ridiculous reasons.



Royal Oak, MI — A disturbing video was uploaded to Facebook Friday that highlights a terrible trend of using police violence to deal with autistic children.
The video shows multiple police officers holding down Kevin, a terrified 13-year-old autistic boy, who is screaming for help.
According his mother, Kevin was non-violent and in his own room without other students. EMS was called in order to treat the boy’s refusal to get up from his desk as a medical situation. However, police showed up and did what they do best.
“After quite a bit of time, because the situation had escalated to the point that it had, and the refusal of staff to leave the room so that I could calm Kevin down myself, and their continual interjections that he had to leave, it became apparent to me that I was not going to be able to remove Kevin myself, nor would he just walk out, and I asked that EMS be called in the hopes that it would be handled more from a medical standpoint.


The first to arrive were two young men from the Fire Department who were very nice, and likely could have succeeded in getting Kevin to agree to leave if staff would have removed themselves from the room and/or at least stopped stating that Kevin had to leave.


Shortly after that the police came in and that was it. A scared, angry, frustrated, panic-stricken, yet seemingly in control very big for his age 13 year old child turned into a caged animal and was treated to some extent by one or two of the officers as such. The big guy smashing his head into the carpet was not my favorite, but of course other than videoing and watching and interjecting verbally for them to ease up and listen to my child was all I could do.”


Sadly this is not an isolated incident. Just last month we brought you the story of 10-year-old Ryan whose autism got him cuffed and thrown on the back of a hot police car.
This tendency to rely on police violence to solve problems is worrisome to say the least. With the rising number of autistic children, and the lack of training police undergo to deal with these children, we could be dealing with a ticking time bomb.
Police used to be trained to deal with people and their respective special needs, now it seems as if their main concern is sporting their new MRAPs.
The training is out there and it is shown to be effective; it’s just that police aren’t doing it.
In a two-part study, researchers looked at use of the crisis intervention team, or CIT, model, a 40-hour program to train police to respond to those with mental health issues. They interviewed 586 officers, 251 of whom had received CIT training, and reviewed more than 1,000 police encounters with individuals believed to have behavioral disorders.
Officers who participated in CIT training were more knowledgeable about mental health issues, treatments and de-escalation skills, according to findings published in the April issue of the journal Psychiatric Services.
What’s more, when looking at emergency responses, incidents involving officers with CIT training were more likely to result in transport to mental health services and less likely to culminate in arrest. Researchers found that officers who had participated in training were also much more likely to indicate that the highest level of force used in their emergency response was verbal engagement or negotiation.
With the increased prevalence in Autism and police aggression in general, something must be done before anymore innocent children or adults suffer.
Original Facebook Post.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/disturbing-facebook-video-shows-police-manhandling-13-year-old-autistic-boy/#Bbi2fPHW8iLHoKjO.99



Middle school student commits suicide at school | theGrio

Middle school student commits suicide at school | theGrio



A Florida middle school student committed suicide in the bathroom last week after allegedly enduring bullying from fellow students.
Lamar Hawkins III, 14, used his father’s gun to shoot himself Wednesday at Greenwood Lakes Middle School, reports WESH. The family told the local news station the weapon had been stored properly.
Shaniqua Hawkins, Lamar’s mother, said the family moved from New York to Florida to escape bullying, but it continued despite the move.
Lamar, who was called Shaq by family, had stunted growth. His mother believes this made him an easy target for bullies.
“I felt paralyzed by the inability to make the bullying stop at school,” she told WESH. “I watched him walk out the door of our home and knew there was a very good chance others would be cruel to him.”
Hundreds of community members gathered at a vigil for Hawkins last week.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

New Bill Would Help Parents Fight School Districts | Care2 Causes

New Bill Would Help Parents Fight School Districts | Care2 Causes



A bill that would help parents fight their school districts might seem weird — after all, wouldn’t parents want to work with their school districts? Some parents are forced to take their districts to the mat, though, typically over disability services for their children, and the process can be frustrating, expensive, and, sometimes, unfruitful.
Senator Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who has proved to be a tireless advocate for disabled Americans, has just taken this issue up, and his proposal will make it easier for parents to take schools on when they refuse to provide sufficient disability services. If the bill passes, it could be yet another step towards full inclusion in schools for disabled children.
The bill involves the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This critical law mandates that school districts provide educational services to disabled children from ages three through 21. Schools are not allowed to discriminate against disabled students, and must work with students, teachers,and parents to develop an individualized education plan (IEP) if necessary to address specific accommodations the student will need to succeed in the classroom.
Sometimes, parents and schools clash over which services children need, whether it’s permission to bring an iPad into the classroom to take notes, more time on tests, or more extensive disability services. In these cases, schools and parents attempt to resolve the issue with a moderator, but the issue sometimes heads to court if the parties cannot resolve it.
The law allows a prevailing party in a case to recoup legal fees, which can be substantial. However, it doesn’t currently permit people to recover costs for expert witnesses. This puts parents in a bind, as they want to get the best services for their children, but they’re also aware that expert special education, medical and disability witnesses can be extremely expensive. If they don’t line up enough witnesses, the case may fail, but if they get the witnesses they need, they might not be able to afford them. Senator Harkin wants to change that by allowing parents to recover the costs not just for their attorneys, but also for their witnesses.
He also proposes that the costs of tests, evaluations and other tools necessary to build a case be covered as well. This would allow parents and children to focus on receiving a comprehensive evaluation, building a supportive witness list, and hiring excellent legal counsel, which will increase the chance of winning in court if the case has merits. In turn, this supports the rights of disabled children to go to school and get the accommodations they need to do well.
This proposal reflects the fact that many parents find it hard to bring IDEA cases to court, which leaves their children deprived of a full access to an education. In other cases, school districts simply wait such cases out, or bring a large complement of witnesses for their side, hoping to outspend parents. This tactic can be effective for wealthier districts, which can afford the up-front costs of waiting until parents are no longer able to keep up with the case. That could all change if this proposal becomes law, and that’s a good thing for disabled children seeking equal access to education.
Lest you think the proposal puts schools over the barrel, he’s also pushing for full funding of IDEA to increase the availability of funds to school districts struggling with accommodations requests. The goal is to make it easier for schools to meet the needs of disabled students, thereby reducing the number of IDEA disputes and to help parents in court when those disputes need to happen so that their children get justice.


Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/new-bill-would-help-parents-fight-school-districts.html#ixzz3DgZ059D1