Saturday, April 25, 2015

House Bill 1019

Lee's Summit R-7 School District: House Bill 1019





House Bill 1019


jrn049.pdf





This bill will take rights away from students that are disabled.  Lee's
Summit has used your tax dollars to promote this bill.  This bill will
protect the school district when they violate your children's civil
rights.








The votes are at this website.  

Right To Work Is Wrong For Missouri

The Facts About So-Called "Right to Work"

So-Called "Right to Work" is WRONG for Missouri workers


So-Called "Right to Work" = Lower Wages for EVERYONE

The average worker in states with right to work (for less) laws makes 3.2% less per year than workers without these laws, whether they are union or not.
http://www.epi.org/publication/bp299/

So-Called "Right to Work" endangers jobsite safety, health standards and employment benefits

Both union and non-union workers are less likely to have either health insurance or pensions through their jobs in right to work states. The rate of employer-sponsored health insurance for workers in right-to-work states is 2.6 percentage points lower than in states without these restrictions.
http://www.epi.org/publication/bp299/

The rate of workplace deaths is 36% higher in right to work states, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
http://www.aflcio.org/.../Ongoing-State.../Right-to-Work

So-Called "Right to Work" is WRONG for Missouri’s businesses

Right to work does NOT improve a state’s business climate.

Right to work is NOT a deciding factor in where businesses locate.
http://www.areadevelopment.com/.../25th-annual-corporate- executive-survey48843.shtml)

So-Called "Right to Work" is WRONG for Missouri’s economy

"Right to Work" does NOT create jobs. Communities actually lose jobs when wages are lowered by right to work.
http://www.epi.org/.../working-hard-indiana-bad-tortured.../

"Right to Work" does not improve the employment rate or boost economic growth. Eight of the twelve states with the highest unemployment rate have right to work laws.
http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm

"Right to Work" cuts wages and stifles job growth by reducing people’s discretionary income. When people have less discretionary income, they spend less, which in turn, hurts the economy.

In addition to the decreased buying power of those in so-called "Right to Work" states, the poverty rate for all people is 19 percent higher in "Right to Work" states. Seven of the ten poorest states are "Right to Work" states.

Friday, March 20, 2015

Who Will Take Care Of Him

I posted this last year, but I feel that it needs to be posted again.

As I am packing my suitcase for my trip I am worrying about Jake.  Not about my absence right now because there are adults that are going to look after him for the twelve days that I am going to be gone.  I worry about what will happen to him after I leave this world.

Who will make sure that he has food?  Who will make sure that he sees the doctor?  Who will make sure that he gets his medication?  Who will take him to the store for his video games?  Who will make sure that his clothes are clean?  Who will make sure that the world doesn't hurt him?  I couldn't protect him from the school district and the emotional and psychological abuse that they heaped upon him, but I have learned so much since then and I protect him with all that I have now.  Who will make sure that he has a place to live, heat, electricity, and air?  Who is going to do all of the things that I will no longer be able to do?

Many times he has told me that he wants to die when I die.  He tells me that he doesn't want to live without me.  I don't want that for him.  I want him to live to a very old age.  But, what have we done to make him want to?

Why do we allow our teachers, principals, administrators, legislators, etc. to hold our children's lives in their hands?  Why do we continue to allow these people to destroy our children's futures and lives?  Why are these people not held accountable for their neglect and abuse?

What is going to happen to the other children like Jake?  Society doesn't care.  They see our children as a drain on taxes, a nuisance in the classroom, a hindrance to their children's education. 

I have read more than one commentary that says that special education students shouldn't be in the classroom with their children.  Their children are advanced students that will make a difference in the world and they need all of the resources that the school district has to help them attain their goal.  Well, my child could have made a difference, too.  But, the resources that he so desperately needed were not there.  They were used on the students that would score high on tests and make the district look good.  They were used on band uniforms that would make the district look affluent.  They were used on AstroTurf that made our football team look better.  They were used on a swimming pool to make the swimming team look better.  They were used on an administrative center that make the district look as good as the county to the west. 

I don't want anyone's pity.  My son has blessed my life in so many ways.  I want people to get angry.  I want them to get as angry as I am and I want them to stand up and say, "I am mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore."  I want millions to stand up and say that EVERY child is special and deserves a chance at a future.   I want EVERY parent to go to bed at night knowing that their child has gotten EVERY chance at a successful future and that they can die without worry.

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Chumbley: Right to work all wrong for Missouri

Chumbley: Right to work all wrong for Missouri



Missouri's General Assembly is preparing to pass the deceptively titled Right to Work and Paycheck Protection bills. These bills are an attack on workers and an offense to the God of justice.
As a Christian, I believe that Jesus is the full and perfect revelation of God, who is love. And Jesus teaches me by example that love is willing and actively working for the good of all people. In the gospels, for instance, when Jesus sees a multitude of hungry people, he has compassion on them and feeds them abundantly with bread and fish.
Daily, inspired by Jesus and empowered by his Spirit, I strive to show compassion toward those in need and to advocate for justice for those who are exploited and oppressed. God is the God of justice, who is working through others for a just world. The Hebrew prophet Isaiah exhorts: "Learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow's cause." And Jeremiah says, "Do justice and righteousness, and deliver from the hand of the oppressor him who has been robbed."
And so my faith in Jesus Christ, who embodies the God of justice, demands that I speak out against the deceptive and destructive Right to Work bills in the assembly. This legislation is not what it purports to be. According to independent research, if these bills were to become law they would be ruinous to workers. The facts are that RTW states, including Oklahoma, do not attract new business. Nor do they spur economic activity or expand employment. Moreover, workers in these states make much less money than workers in pro-worker states.
The real aim of anti-worker legislation here and elsewhere is to reduce wages (except for occupants of corporate offices and board rooms), eliminate health insurance and other benefits and remove regulations that ensure worker safety — all for the purpose of generating maximum profits and compensation and benefits for the owners and investors in anti-worker enterprises.
Like all human beings, Missouri workers are made in the image of God. They are not production costs to be reduced or expenses to be eliminated. And workers should be treated justly and with respect. They should not be stripped of their God-given rights and dignity, emptied of all productive capacity, impoverished and then discarded like useless machinery.
RTW legislation is right for the billionaire Koch brothers and their American Legislative Exchange Council, which drafted it and directed our Assembly members to secure its passage into law. But it is wrong for the working people of Missouri and wrong in the eyes of the God of justice.
Members of the Missouri General Assembly, hear the word God speaks through his prophet Amos: "Let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream." And obey. Do right, not wrong.
The Rev. Kenneth L. Chumbley is an Episcopal priest in Springfield.

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

PRESS RELEASE: Sen. Keaveny Files Legislation to End Corporal Punishment in Missouri Public Schools - The Missouri Times

PRESS RELEASE: Sen. Keaveny Files Legislation to End Corporal Punishment in Missouri Public Schools - The Missouri Times



JEFFERSON CITY—This week, Sen. Joseph Keaveny, D-St. Louis, filed Senate Bill 241, which would prohibit the use of corporal punishment in all public Missouri schools. If signed into law, the legislation would end the use of spanking or paddling by educators as a form of punishment.

Currently, the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education requires each school district’s written discipline policy to include a portion dedicated to corporal punishment. The local school board is responsible for determining if and how it will be used, and whether a parent will be notified or can opt for an alternate type of discipline.

Senator Keaveny noted that corporal punishment is a fairly archaic form of discipline that most states have already done away with. Missouri is one of only 19 that still allow it; of those, Missouri ranked ninth on a list of states where corporal punishment was used the most.

“Times are changing, and as a state, we need to change with them. Thirty, forty years ago, corporal punishment was culturally accepted. Many viewed it as a deterrent. But, modern studies, and first-person accounts from administrators and teachers alike, have debunked that belief. It’s not an effective form of discipline. Also, most parents are no longer comfortable with the idea of a non-family member, much less a public employee, administering this type of punishment,” said Sen. Keaveny. “Children should feel safe at school, and shouldn’t fear physical harm from those tasked with protecting and educating them.”

Senate Bill 241 would prohibit the use of corporal punishment in all public schools in Missouri. The measure would also require school districts’ discipline policy to prohibit the use of corporal punishment and spanking.

Last year, Sen. Keaveny sponsored similar legislation. During the committee hearing on that bill, numerous students and teachers testified in support of the measure.

“It’s a sad reality, but we now live in a world where we routinely have to discuss ways to protect our students from the types of violent atrocities that have taken place in this country over the last decade,” said Sen. Keaveny. “As we work to make children feel safer at school from physical harm, I believe it’s important we end a practice that many feel is no longer acceptable or even effective.” 

For more information on Senate Bill 241, or any other measures filed by Sen. Keaveny, visit his official Missouri Senate website at www.senate.mo.gov/keaveny.

2012 State Medicaid Rankings - Disability Scoop

2012 State Medicaid Rankings - Disability Scoop



Arizona offers the best Medicaid services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities while Mississippi provides the worst, according to United Cerebral Palsy’s 2012 report “The Case for Inclusion.”
Find out where your state stands in the ranking of the 50 states and the District of Columbia:
1. Arizona
2. Michigan
3. California
4. New Hampshire
5. Vermont
6. Massachusetts
7. Connecticut
8. Washington
9. New York
10. Pennsylvania
11. Maryland
12. Idaho
13. South Carolina
14. New Mexico
15. South Dakota
16. Delaware
17. Nevada
18. Montana
19. Hawaii
20. Florida
21. Georgia
22. Oregon
23. Missouri
24. Maine
25. Louisiana
26. Minnesota
27. Wisconsin
28. Colorado
29. West Virginia
30. Alaska
31. Kentucky
32. Rhode Island
33. Alabama
34. Ohio
35. Wyoming
36. Kansas
37. New Jersey
38. Oklahoma
39. North Dakota
40. District of Columbia
41. Nebraska
42. Tennessee
43. Iowa
44. North Carolina
45. Utah
46. Indiana
47. Virginia
48. Illinois
49. Arkansas
50. Texas
51. Mississippi