Wednesday, January 14, 2015

PRESS RELEASE: Sen. Keaveny Files Legislation to End Corporal Punishment in Missouri Public Schools - The Missouri Times

PRESS RELEASE: Sen. Keaveny Files Legislation to End Corporal Punishment in Missouri Public Schools - The Missouri Times



JEFFERSON CITY—This week, Sen. Joseph Keaveny, D-St. Louis, filed Senate Bill 241, which would prohibit the use of corporal punishment in all public Missouri schools. If signed into law, the legislation would end the use of spanking or paddling by educators as a form of punishment.

Currently, the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education requires each school district’s written discipline policy to include a portion dedicated to corporal punishment. The local school board is responsible for determining if and how it will be used, and whether a parent will be notified or can opt for an alternate type of discipline.

Senator Keaveny noted that corporal punishment is a fairly archaic form of discipline that most states have already done away with. Missouri is one of only 19 that still allow it; of those, Missouri ranked ninth on a list of states where corporal punishment was used the most.

“Times are changing, and as a state, we need to change with them. Thirty, forty years ago, corporal punishment was culturally accepted. Many viewed it as a deterrent. But, modern studies, and first-person accounts from administrators and teachers alike, have debunked that belief. It’s not an effective form of discipline. Also, most parents are no longer comfortable with the idea of a non-family member, much less a public employee, administering this type of punishment,” said Sen. Keaveny. “Children should feel safe at school, and shouldn’t fear physical harm from those tasked with protecting and educating them.”

Senate Bill 241 would prohibit the use of corporal punishment in all public schools in Missouri. The measure would also require school districts’ discipline policy to prohibit the use of corporal punishment and spanking.

Last year, Sen. Keaveny sponsored similar legislation. During the committee hearing on that bill, numerous students and teachers testified in support of the measure.

“It’s a sad reality, but we now live in a world where we routinely have to discuss ways to protect our students from the types of violent atrocities that have taken place in this country over the last decade,” said Sen. Keaveny. “As we work to make children feel safer at school from physical harm, I believe it’s important we end a practice that many feel is no longer acceptable or even effective.” 

For more information on Senate Bill 241, or any other measures filed by Sen. Keaveny, visit his official Missouri Senate website at www.senate.mo.gov/keaveny.

2012 State Medicaid Rankings - Disability Scoop

2012 State Medicaid Rankings - Disability Scoop



Arizona offers the best Medicaid services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities while Mississippi provides the worst, according to United Cerebral Palsy’s 2012 report “The Case for Inclusion.”
Find out where your state stands in the ranking of the 50 states and the District of Columbia:
1. Arizona
2. Michigan
3. California
4. New Hampshire
5. Vermont
6. Massachusetts
7. Connecticut
8. Washington
9. New York
10. Pennsylvania
11. Maryland
12. Idaho
13. South Carolina
14. New Mexico
15. South Dakota
16. Delaware
17. Nevada
18. Montana
19. Hawaii
20. Florida
21. Georgia
22. Oregon
23. Missouri
24. Maine
25. Louisiana
26. Minnesota
27. Wisconsin
28. Colorado
29. West Virginia
30. Alaska
31. Kentucky
32. Rhode Island
33. Alabama
34. Ohio
35. Wyoming
36. Kansas
37. New Jersey
38. Oklahoma
39. North Dakota
40. District of Columbia
41. Nebraska
42. Tennessee
43. Iowa
44. North Carolina
45. Utah
46. Indiana
47. Virginia
48. Illinois
49. Arkansas
50. Texas
51. Mississippi

Thursday, January 1, 2015

Missouri Jeff Grisamore is an #ALEC Lover #VoteNo2ALEC Lovers | Veooz 360

Missouri Jeff Grisamore is an #ALEC Lover #VoteNo2ALEC Lovers | Veooz 360

Cottonwood employees testify in hearing to keep center open - KFVS12 News & Weather Cape Girardeau, Carbondale, Poplar Bluff

Cottonwood employees testify in hearing to keep center open - KFVS12 News & Weather Cape Girardeau, Carbondale, Poplar Bluff



"It was apparent to everyone in attendance that the Representatives there were largely in favor of keeping cottonwood open. State Representative Jeff Grisamore, District 047, was the only member of the committee that said he agreed with closing the facility," according to Dale.

Privatization in Education—Not as Scary as Some Think

Privatization in Education—Not as Scary as Some Think



In a classic episode of The Three Stooges, the phrase “Niagara Falls” triggered a visceral reaction from Moe and Larry, which ended with Curly getting punched, slapped, and thrown to the ground. I am often reminded of that episode when I talk to policymakers and public school officials about school choice. Like Moe and Larry, they seem to have their own trigger word—privatization.
Many reject outright the idea of allowing public dollars to follow a student to the school of his or her choice—including a private school. Never mind that there is a long history of individuals using public dollars at privately operated pre-schools and universities. When faced with this proposition for K-12 education, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon (D) said that is where he draws the line. Missouri Rep. Jeff Grisamore (R–Lee’s Summit) echoed his sentiment: “Public schools should be publicly funded and private schools should be privately funded, period.” Like the reaction to Niagara Falls, these responses are almost comical.
They are laughable because public dollars already flow to private institutions. Examples abound. Nixa Public Schools outsourced maintenance to Sodexo based out of Paris, France. St. Louis Public Schools contract with First Student, “the largest bus company in North America,” for transportation services. More than 100 public school districts contract with Chesterfield, Mo.-based Opaa! to provide food service for public school students.
Every day, school districts rely on private, for-profit providers to deliver services and supplies. Some even contract with private schools to serve their most at-risk students. Yet, for some reason there is strenuous objection to private school choice programs that allow individuals to direct their education dollars to the school of their choice.
Opponents of school choice claim that private schools are unaccountable. That is, they do not have to teach the state’s academic standards, administer state standardized exams, or comply with a host of burdensome regulations.
This argument assumes that the only way to have accountability is through government regulations. That is not the case. Accountability simply looks different in a school choice system.
When parents choose a school for their child, they essentially are entering into a contract with the school for the education of their child. In the traditional system, parents have little recourse if the school fails to meet that obligation. They can meet with teachers, principals, and central office staff. They can even take their plight to the school board. At the end of the day, however, they have very little ability to hold the school accountable for meeting their needs. They are dependent upon the school for change.
In a school choice system, however, the dynamic is very different. In fact, the arrangement between parents and schools in a school choice system closely resembles the contracts between public schools and private service providers. If Opaa! fails to provide nutritious meals, they can be fired. Similarly, if a school fails to keep a child safe or does not live up to the expectations of the parents, the school can be fired.
Choice is a powerful accountability tool.
Opponents of school choice like to throw out the word privatization as if it was a bad thing. Yet, public schools contract with private providers in nearly every aspect of our K-12 education system.
If the goal is to provide a world-class education to students, policymakers need to avoid the knee-jerk reaction against school choice and recognize that the private sector can help deliver on the promise that every child should have access to great schools.

Missouri House Republican leaders continue to push for 'right to work' bill : News

Missouri House Republican leaders continue to push for 'right to work' bill : News



Rep. Jeff Grisamore, R-Lee’s Summit, was absent on the first right to work vote and has gotten pressure from both sides on the issue but not as much lately. “It’s been quiet,” said Rep. Jeff Grisamore, R-Lee’s Summit. “It seems to be dead for sure in the Senate.”

How He Votes For Workers

Project Vote Smart - The Voter's Self Defense System



04/30/2014
12/04/2013
05/15/2013
08/07/2012
06/11/2012
04/26/2012
03/07/2012
02/09/2012
03/03/2011

How He Votes or Doesn't Vote

Project Vote Smart - The Voter's Self Defense System



12/04/2013
08/07/2012
06/11/2012
05/15/2012
04/28/2010
03/17/2010
05/14/2009
04/16/2009
03/26/2009
02/26/2009
05/05/2008
04/24/2008
04/16/2008
03/27/2008
05/07/2007
03/01/2007

Blog CCP: Grisamore (47th) Dead in the Water

Blog CCP: Grisamore (47th) Dead in the Water



Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Grisamore (47th) Dead in the Water

Let's say you win your first election by a huge margin of 378 votes. Let's say you are the incumbent and your party has the majority. Then, let's say that your party abandoned the will of the people and removed caps on contributions - effectively putting Missouri goverment up for sale to the highest bidder. Don't you think you would raise some cash?

Well, Rep. Grisamore (R) from Lee's Summit is so well liked in his community that he has garnered a whopping $250 in support from his constiutents, according to the Missouri Ethic Commission report filed on July 16, 2007. Not that cash is king, but it tells you a little bit. Grisamore carried the Republican party line, which is not how this district votes. He has not been a leader in Jefferson City, just a follower.

The 47th House District is calling out for progressive leadership. All the D candidate needs is 190 more votes and we are one step closer to taking back the Missouri House.