http://www.tonyskansascity.com/2010/02/kansas-city-state-rep-talboy-calls-lees.html
Monday, February 22, 2010
Kansas City State Rep. Talboy Calls Lee's Summit Grisamore Cowardly For Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse Program Cuts!!!
In an afternoon press release Kansas City's Downtown Rep. Mike Talboy makes a good point about GOP double speak when it comes to the interests of families and children. Check it:
Grisamore Votes To Cut Millions from Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse Programs Cuts result in a 50% reduction to existing funds for services
Jefferson City, MO— In a 6-5-1 vote Rep. Jeff Grisamore voted “present” allowing the passage of millions in cuts to domestic violence and sexual abuse programs. The amendment, which came before the appropriations committee on health, mental health and social services, called for a 50% reduction to state funding of Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse programs.
“Missouri families are tired of politicians that say one thing while in district and do another in Jefferson City. Jeff Grisamore, through a simple “no” vote could have blocked $2.3 million from being taken away from women and children who are victims of some of the most heinous acts imaginable. Instead, after party pressure, he took the cowardly and reprehensible approach by voting “present”, allowing the cuts to pass and that is shameful,” said House Democratic Leader-elect, Representative Mike Talboy (D-Kansas City).
The cuts would take over $2.3 million from Domestic violence programs, which is over 50% of the budget. Even worse they would take over $1.6 million away from Children’s Division Field Staff which could lead to a loss of accreditation. The vote also zeroed out the line item for Women and Minority Health Programs and cut over $9.5 million from FQHC. In addition, the state Child Care Assistance program, which Grisamore says he supports and wishes to expand, had the line item of $13.6 million dollars completely cut. The zeroing out of those funds means Missouri loses out on $38 million of federal assistance to the program as well. All together the cuts would result in over $51 million taken away from these services.
“Despite what he says when a camera or reporter is around, Jeff Grisamore simply turns his back on women and children in this state when they are in their most vulnerable or traumatic times,” added Talboy.
“The bottom line is, as a Lee’s Summit resident and father, I know our community places children first. Jeff Grisamore can no longer come back to Lee’s Summit telling voters he cares about kids. If he did he would have chosen them over his party leaders and fought for the $51 million,” said House Democratic Campaign Committee Director Chris Moreno.
######
During The Great Recession it's interesting to see the priorities of local politicos . . . Also, some name calling is kinda cool too.
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Monday, February 22, 2010
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Budget Bill Passes/Talboy States That Grisamore Doesn't Care About Children
Budget bill passes after heated debate in House
Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 3:43 PM
By Brent Martin
A bill to shore up the current state budget has passed the legislature, but not before Democrats harshly criticize Republicans for rejecting a proposal made by fellow Democrat Governor Nixon.
The House put the final touches on SCS HCS HB14 with a 91-to-67 vote and sent it to Nixon. The supplemental budget bill was held up in the Senate for a time. The Missouri Department of Transportation contended a provision calling for accountability of how the state spent federal economic stimulus funds could interfere with highway and bridge contracts. The Senate fixed the problem and returned the bill to the House.
Majority Republicans rejected a proposal by Nixon which the governor claims would provide health care coverage to an additional 20,000 children.
"Covering kids should be the one thing that this state does, the fundamental, one thing that this state does with its health care dollars," said Rep. Mike Talboy, a Democrat from Kansas City during House floor debate.
Talboy launched into a harsh exchange with Republican Rep. Jeff Grisamore of Lee's Summit, contending that Republicans in general and Grisamore in particular didn't care about children.
"You don't want to cover kids," Talboy asserted, often talking over Grisamore during their House floor debate.
Grisamore defended the Republican stance. He claimed that the governor's proposal wouldn't add any children to the state health insurance program, but would only eliminate or lower the premiums parents have to pay for children to be on it.
That explanation didn't satisfy Talboy. Grisamore said the current program offers health care to families making up to $73,000/year. He asked Talboy if we wanted that threshold raised.
"I think I made my point pretty clear on that, I would cover every kid regardless." Talboy responded
Grisamore pressed him, asking if the state should extend health care coverage to children even if their parents earn a six figure salary. Talboy answered, "Yes."
The supplemental budget bill totals $133 million. It supplements the current state budget, plugging in holes where revenue fell short. The Nixon Administration requested $939,000 be added to the bill. Administration officials said that would allow Missouri to draw down $5 million in federal funding which could be used to expand health care coverage for children.
The State Family Support Division says legislation approved in 2005 extended health care to 41,000 children, 16,000 of whom lost health care when their parents failed to pay the premiums. Currently, a Missouri family making between 150 to 185% of the federal poverty level must pay $66/month to receive SCHIP coverage. The monthly premium rises to $109 for families earning between 186 and 225% of poverty and to $165 for families earning between 226 and 300% of poverty. The Nixon Administration proposes dropping the premium requirement.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009, 3:43 PM
By Brent Martin
A bill to shore up the current state budget has passed the legislature, but not before Democrats harshly criticize Republicans for rejecting a proposal made by fellow Democrat Governor Nixon.
The House put the final touches on SCS HCS HB14 with a 91-to-67 vote and sent it to Nixon. The supplemental budget bill was held up in the Senate for a time. The Missouri Department of Transportation contended a provision calling for accountability of how the state spent federal economic stimulus funds could interfere with highway and bridge contracts. The Senate fixed the problem and returned the bill to the House.
Majority Republicans rejected a proposal by Nixon which the governor claims would provide health care coverage to an additional 20,000 children.
"Covering kids should be the one thing that this state does, the fundamental, one thing that this state does with its health care dollars," said Rep. Mike Talboy, a Democrat from Kansas City during House floor debate.
Talboy launched into a harsh exchange with Republican Rep. Jeff Grisamore of Lee's Summit, contending that Republicans in general and Grisamore in particular didn't care about children.
"You don't want to cover kids," Talboy asserted, often talking over Grisamore during their House floor debate.
Grisamore defended the Republican stance. He claimed that the governor's proposal wouldn't add any children to the state health insurance program, but would only eliminate or lower the premiums parents have to pay for children to be on it.
That explanation didn't satisfy Talboy. Grisamore said the current program offers health care to families making up to $73,000/year. He asked Talboy if we wanted that threshold raised.
"I think I made my point pretty clear on that, I would cover every kid regardless." Talboy responded
Grisamore pressed him, asking if the state should extend health care coverage to children even if their parents earn a six figure salary. Talboy answered, "Yes."
The supplemental budget bill totals $133 million. It supplements the current state budget, plugging in holes where revenue fell short. The Nixon Administration requested $939,000 be added to the bill. Administration officials said that would allow Missouri to draw down $5 million in federal funding which could be used to expand health care coverage for children.
The State Family Support Division says legislation approved in 2005 extended health care to 41,000 children, 16,000 of whom lost health care when their parents failed to pay the premiums. Currently, a Missouri family making between 150 to 185% of the federal poverty level must pay $66/month to receive SCHIP coverage. The monthly premium rises to $109 for families earning between 186 and 225% of poverty and to $165 for families earning between 226 and 300% of poverty. The Nixon Administration proposes dropping the premium requirement.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Jeff Grisamore States That District Won't Meet With Me Without His OK
As for a committee on autism and special needs in R-7, I have spoken to the Superintendent and Board, which relates to why he spoke to you. If that committee is formed, you will have one voice, although I would like to see D on it too, along with others, such as J. That will be up to R-7. Given your antagonism toward me and them, you are most fortunate you are being considered to be on such a committee. I would encourage you to consider changing your approach for the sake of LSASG's credibility and influence with R-7 and beyond. Your current approach is only isolating and alienating yourself from me and others who are doing much to help children with autism and their families.
This is in response to my email where I asked the Superintendent if Jeff Grisamore was setting up these meetings and if the district will only work through him.
"Rep grisamore is getting ahead of himself. There have been no follow up discussions about any ideas that may have been mentioned in some setting. Honestly, I do not recall discussing this committee but I may have forgotten. It happens. My invitation to discuss the issues is for you only at this time. You and I can discuss together where all of this goes from there. I hope this clarifies my intention. I do not go into this knowing where we will end up but do feel our dialogue has the potential to make us a better district and help you better understand our challenges. I am really looking forward to our meetings."
This is in response to my email where I asked the Superintendent if Jeff Grisamore was setting up these meetings and if the district will only work through him.
"Rep grisamore is getting ahead of himself. There have been no follow up discussions about any ideas that may have been mentioned in some setting. Honestly, I do not recall discussing this committee but I may have forgotten. It happens. My invitation to discuss the issues is for you only at this time. You and I can discuss together where all of this goes from there. I hope this clarifies my intention. I do not go into this knowing where we will end up but do feel our dialogue has the potential to make us a better district and help you better understand our challenges. I am really looking forward to our meetings."
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Interim Committee on Autism Spectrum Disorders
I was deeply saddened to read that Jeff Grisamore was appointed to the Interim Committee on Autism Spectrum Disorders. In my dealings with Representative Grisamore, I have found him to be less than honest. He has met with my group and then taken information back to our school district. He has given false information to the school district about my group. He has even told me that the only way for me to meet with the Superintendent was through him. The Superintendent quickly informed me that Representative Grisamore was overstepping his authority.
Representative Grisamore has used our autistic children as a stepping stone in his career. I would have liked to see someone with more integrity on the committee. It also would have been nice if the Kansas City metro area were represented better. Our children needs are many and education is probably the biggest obstacle. Representative Grisamore will never address that because he is endorsed by the school district, NEA, and many, many more principal, teacher, and school administration organizations.
I would be glad to share more details, if you would like to see them. I don’t say these things without merit or proof. It is sad that our children are being used in this manner and that the only outcome will be Jeff Grisamore earning more accolades.
Representative Grisamore has used our autistic children as a stepping stone in his career. I would have liked to see someone with more integrity on the committee. It also would have been nice if the Kansas City metro area were represented better. Our children needs are many and education is probably the biggest obstacle. Representative Grisamore will never address that because he is endorsed by the school district, NEA, and many, many more principal, teacher, and school administration organizations.
I would be glad to share more details, if you would like to see them. I don’t say these things without merit or proof. It is sad that our children are being used in this manner and that the only outcome will be Jeff Grisamore earning more accolades.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Has Grisamore Once Again Rode In On His White Horse
There is buzz around Lee's Summit that Grisamore has singlehandedly gotten a woman at the top of the liver transplant list at KU and forced Medicaid to cover. Is there no end to what miracles he can deliver? I suggest that those that believe he is the third coming check this out. With Grisamore, all is NEVER what it seems.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Alliance For Orphans and Widows
Jeff Grisamore Launches ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS AND WIDOWS
The Board of Directors is pleased to announce that Children of Promise International has commissioned our president, Jeff Grisamore, to launch a new initiative, hereby known as, the Alliance for Orphans and Widows. As President of Children of Promise since 2000, Jeff's legacy has been a consistent passion for the care of orphans and widows, a quality that will serve him well in this new endeavor. Jeff will assume his new duties as founder and president of Alliance for Orphans and Widows in April 2006.
The vision of the Alliance for Orphans and Widows is to help catalyze and enable more organizations to actively engage in orphan and widow care. Because of his commitment to this vision, Jeff will seek funding and programming opportunities not only for Children of Promise, but also for other organizations who share God's heart to care for orphans and widows. Children of Promise and Alliance for Orphans and Widows will seek continued partnership to care for orphans and widows, the poor, and those who have never heard the Gospel.
Dr. Lynn Wiens will be the interim President of Children of Promise International until a more permanent position can be arranged. Dr. Wiens, along with his wife, Dr. Ann Wiens, have been members of our Board of Directors since 2002. Dr. Wiens is a physician in Hutchinson, Kansas where he resides with his wife and five children, Peter, Josiah, Abigail, Evangelina, and Amber Joy.
We are thankful to God for Jeff's six years of faithful service to Children of Promise International. Please join us in praying for Jeff, his wife Mary, and their children in this new venture.
Thank you for your continuing commitment and generosity to the mission of Children of Promise, as we care for orphans, widows, and the poor worldwide, in order to reach the unreached with the Gospel. Your faithfulness is greatly appreciated.
Alliance Charities, the donor advised fund I direct at Servant Christian Community Foundation (SCCF) Contributions are tax-deductible and you will receive tax receipt from SCCF.
Alliance Charitiesc/o Servant Christian Community Foundation
706 N. Lindenwood Drive
Olathe, KS 66062
You can also make secured credit card contributions online at www.alliancefororphans.org
If you have questions, please call Jeff Grisamore at 816.225.5695 or email him at jeff@alliancefororphans.org
Why choose a Giving Fund?
Your SCCF Giving Fund can serve your church or ministry in a wide variety of ways – as a capital fund, endowment, community outreach, or other purpose. Its many benefits include:
Flexibility – Accept all kinds of non-cash gifts – from real estate to business interests to restricted securities – and reduce your legal liability in the process.
Simplicity – Manage all aspects of your Fund online and leave all of the administrative tasks to SCCF (such as liquidation of assets).
Opportunity – Create new opportunities to influence your supporters on planning their giving – and how to get the greatest joy and impact out of their giving.
Privacy – Your Fund is confidential and not subject to public record searches.
Legacy – Deepen the relationship that your supporters have with your church or ministry, and strengthen your church or ministry by implementing a system of financial support for years to come.
Creating A Culture of Generosity
That's the vision behind Servant Christian Community Foundation (SCCF).SCCF helps people give creatively and efficiently. We provide tools, resources and expertise that enable givers to give more generously and to use the most tax-efficient methods for giving.
Our donor advised funds are tailored to accommodate your giving needs. SCCF serves families/individuals, churches, ministries, and professional advisors.
Why a Christian Community Foundation
There are at least ten major reasons why you should seriously consider establishing a Foundation Fund with the Servant Christian Community Foundation. Of course, responsible stewardship and the satisfaction of contributing resources to be used for Christian causes are the most important reasons of all.
1. A Private Foundation Alternative. A Foundation Fund with SCCF is very much like having your own private foundation without the drawbacks. Your Fund can even be personalized, i.e., 'The John Smith Foundation Fund.' By channeling your gifts through SCCF rather than establishing your own private foundation, you avoid costly legal fees, restrictions on contributions, excise taxes, and penalties often associated with private foundations.
2. Give Now, Distribute Later. One of the unique aspects of SCCF is that you can make your charitable contribution, take a current year tax deduction, but elect not to distribute some or all of those funds until a later year. You have up to 10 years before distributions must begin from the SCCF fund you have established.
3. Giving Appreciated Property. You may give non-cash charitable contributions including real property, limited partnerships, stocks, notes, etc. You get your full tax deduction, even if SCCF holds the asset for a period of time before it is converted to cash. To make gifting more simple, SCCF can receive gifts of marketable securities directly into a SCCF brokerage account.
4. Higher Deductions than Private Foundations. Making a donation to SCCF allows you to take a deduction of up to 50% of your adjusted gross income as opposed to 30% if you had your own foundation. Certain gifts to private foundations are limited to cost basis deductions where as the full-appreciated value may be deducted when donated through SCCF.
5. Simplified Giving. SCCF can simplify your giving and save you time by administering the distribution of gifts for you. For instance, should a donor wish to make a large donation of property or stock and wish to divide the proceeds among many different worthy causes, SCCF can sell the property and distribute the proceeds in accordance with your recommendations.
6. Future Giving. SCCF can be named the beneficiary of your Charitable Remainder or Charitable Lead Trusts, and SCCF can be owner and beneficiary of an insurance policy on your life. At your death the proceeds can be used to set up a Foundation Fund for distribution as designated by your children or appointees. The contribution you make to SCCF to pay insurance premiums may be tax deductible.
7. Anonymity. You have the option of making your gift(s) anonymous. The source of a gift to a particular recipient need not be revealed if desired by the donor.
8. Wills/Life Insurance. SCCF can be named in your Will to receive a portion of your estate. In such a case, either your will, or the contract with SCCF signed during your lifetime, can designate the charities to receive the distributions from your Foundation Fund. You can also designate the person, or persons, who will make the distribution decisions regarding your Foundation Fund after your death.
9. Gifts to Needy Individuals. SCCF can assist you in your ministry of benevolence through our affiliate, Helping Hands Ministries, allowing you to make tax-deductible payments to needy individuals who are not related to you
About Servant Christian Community Foundation SCCF is one of a nationwide network of Local Christian Foundations that are affiliated with The National Christian Foundation (NCF). Since 1982, this network has granted more than $1.6 billion to over 15,000 churches and ministries worldwide.SCCF offers expert counsel and innovative, flexible giving solutions to help:
Individuals and families make a greater impact with their charitable giving, give practically any asset entrusted to them, and balance their giving with income needs
Churches and ministries offer their supporters creative ways of giving, which can lead to significant new funding for their organization Professional advisors (financial planners, CPAs, attorneys, and others) present charitable giving expertise to their clients, which turns their practice into a ministry and builds stronger relationships
The National Christian Foundation, with whom SCCF is affiliated, is a member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA).Resource Network.
You will have access to Christian advisors and fellow donors who can help you think through your stewardship or estate questions:
How much should I leave my children?
Is an endowed family foundation wise?
What happens if a ministry or organization to which I've left money changes direction after I die?
Where do I find Christian attorneys and other Christian professionals?
The Board of Directors is pleased to announce that Children of Promise International has commissioned our president, Jeff Grisamore, to launch a new initiative, hereby known as, the Alliance for Orphans and Widows. As President of Children of Promise since 2000, Jeff's legacy has been a consistent passion for the care of orphans and widows, a quality that will serve him well in this new endeavor. Jeff will assume his new duties as founder and president of Alliance for Orphans and Widows in April 2006.
The vision of the Alliance for Orphans and Widows is to help catalyze and enable more organizations to actively engage in orphan and widow care. Because of his commitment to this vision, Jeff will seek funding and programming opportunities not only for Children of Promise, but also for other organizations who share God's heart to care for orphans and widows. Children of Promise and Alliance for Orphans and Widows will seek continued partnership to care for orphans and widows, the poor, and those who have never heard the Gospel.
Dr. Lynn Wiens will be the interim President of Children of Promise International until a more permanent position can be arranged. Dr. Wiens, along with his wife, Dr. Ann Wiens, have been members of our Board of Directors since 2002. Dr. Wiens is a physician in Hutchinson, Kansas where he resides with his wife and five children, Peter, Josiah, Abigail, Evangelina, and Amber Joy.
We are thankful to God for Jeff's six years of faithful service to Children of Promise International. Please join us in praying for Jeff, his wife Mary, and their children in this new venture.
Thank you for your continuing commitment and generosity to the mission of Children of Promise, as we care for orphans, widows, and the poor worldwide, in order to reach the unreached with the Gospel. Your faithfulness is greatly appreciated.
Alliance Charities, the donor advised fund I direct at Servant Christian Community Foundation (SCCF) Contributions are tax-deductible and you will receive tax receipt from SCCF.
Alliance Charitiesc/o Servant Christian Community Foundation
706 N. Lindenwood Drive
Olathe, KS 66062
You can also make secured credit card contributions online at www.alliancefororphans.org
If you have questions, please call Jeff Grisamore at 816.225.5695 or email him at jeff@alliancefororphans.org
Why choose a Giving Fund?
Your SCCF Giving Fund can serve your church or ministry in a wide variety of ways – as a capital fund, endowment, community outreach, or other purpose. Its many benefits include:
Flexibility – Accept all kinds of non-cash gifts – from real estate to business interests to restricted securities – and reduce your legal liability in the process.
Simplicity – Manage all aspects of your Fund online and leave all of the administrative tasks to SCCF (such as liquidation of assets).
Opportunity – Create new opportunities to influence your supporters on planning their giving – and how to get the greatest joy and impact out of their giving.
Privacy – Your Fund is confidential and not subject to public record searches.
Legacy – Deepen the relationship that your supporters have with your church or ministry, and strengthen your church or ministry by implementing a system of financial support for years to come.
Creating A Culture of Generosity
That's the vision behind Servant Christian Community Foundation (SCCF).SCCF helps people give creatively and efficiently. We provide tools, resources and expertise that enable givers to give more generously and to use the most tax-efficient methods for giving.
Our donor advised funds are tailored to accommodate your giving needs. SCCF serves families/individuals, churches, ministries, and professional advisors.
Why a Christian Community Foundation
There are at least ten major reasons why you should seriously consider establishing a Foundation Fund with the Servant Christian Community Foundation. Of course, responsible stewardship and the satisfaction of contributing resources to be used for Christian causes are the most important reasons of all.
1. A Private Foundation Alternative. A Foundation Fund with SCCF is very much like having your own private foundation without the drawbacks. Your Fund can even be personalized, i.e., 'The John Smith Foundation Fund.' By channeling your gifts through SCCF rather than establishing your own private foundation, you avoid costly legal fees, restrictions on contributions, excise taxes, and penalties often associated with private foundations.
2. Give Now, Distribute Later. One of the unique aspects of SCCF is that you can make your charitable contribution, take a current year tax deduction, but elect not to distribute some or all of those funds until a later year. You have up to 10 years before distributions must begin from the SCCF fund you have established.
3. Giving Appreciated Property. You may give non-cash charitable contributions including real property, limited partnerships, stocks, notes, etc. You get your full tax deduction, even if SCCF holds the asset for a period of time before it is converted to cash. To make gifting more simple, SCCF can receive gifts of marketable securities directly into a SCCF brokerage account.
4. Higher Deductions than Private Foundations. Making a donation to SCCF allows you to take a deduction of up to 50% of your adjusted gross income as opposed to 30% if you had your own foundation. Certain gifts to private foundations are limited to cost basis deductions where as the full-appreciated value may be deducted when donated through SCCF.
5. Simplified Giving. SCCF can simplify your giving and save you time by administering the distribution of gifts for you. For instance, should a donor wish to make a large donation of property or stock and wish to divide the proceeds among many different worthy causes, SCCF can sell the property and distribute the proceeds in accordance with your recommendations.
6. Future Giving. SCCF can be named the beneficiary of your Charitable Remainder or Charitable Lead Trusts, and SCCF can be owner and beneficiary of an insurance policy on your life. At your death the proceeds can be used to set up a Foundation Fund for distribution as designated by your children or appointees. The contribution you make to SCCF to pay insurance premiums may be tax deductible.
7. Anonymity. You have the option of making your gift(s) anonymous. The source of a gift to a particular recipient need not be revealed if desired by the donor.
8. Wills/Life Insurance. SCCF can be named in your Will to receive a portion of your estate. In such a case, either your will, or the contract with SCCF signed during your lifetime, can designate the charities to receive the distributions from your Foundation Fund. You can also designate the person, or persons, who will make the distribution decisions regarding your Foundation Fund after your death.
9. Gifts to Needy Individuals. SCCF can assist you in your ministry of benevolence through our affiliate, Helping Hands Ministries, allowing you to make tax-deductible payments to needy individuals who are not related to you
About Servant Christian Community Foundation SCCF is one of a nationwide network of Local Christian Foundations that are affiliated with The National Christian Foundation (NCF). Since 1982, this network has granted more than $1.6 billion to over 15,000 churches and ministries worldwide.SCCF offers expert counsel and innovative, flexible giving solutions to help:
Individuals and families make a greater impact with their charitable giving, give practically any asset entrusted to them, and balance their giving with income needs
Churches and ministries offer their supporters creative ways of giving, which can lead to significant new funding for their organization Professional advisors (financial planners, CPAs, attorneys, and others) present charitable giving expertise to their clients, which turns their practice into a ministry and builds stronger relationships
The National Christian Foundation, with whom SCCF is affiliated, is a member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA).Resource Network.
You will have access to Christian advisors and fellow donors who can help you think through your stewardship or estate questions:
How much should I leave my children?
Is an endowed family foundation wise?
What happens if a ministry or organization to which I've left money changes direction after I die?
Where do I find Christian attorneys and other Christian professionals?
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore uses the death of his infant daughter to ask for campaign cash
http://www.pitch.com/content/printVersion/577870
Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore uses the death of his infant daughter to ask for campaign cash
By David Martin
published: April 10, 2008
Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore wants to inspire others — and get re-elected.
Upon taking office last year, Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore went to work for the vulnerable. The first bill he sponsored would have expanded the number of families eligible to receive child-care assistance.
Grisamore, a Lee's Summit Republican, didn't let party politics stand in the way of what he likes to call "responsible compassion." More than half of the bill's 56 co-sponsors were Democrats.
The bill died in committee, but Grisamore has continued to work on behalf of people who face adversity. Five of the 10 bills he has sponsored in this session concern the disabled.
Grisamore says the disabled and the mentally ill should receive the first portions of the state budget. "Instead, they end up having to fight for crumbs off the table," he tells me.
It's about 6 p.m., and Grisamore is sitting in a chair in his office at the Capitol, a Diet Coke within reach. The House has broken for dinner. With a long list of bills on the docket, Grisamore expects the workday to last until midnight.
This is a busy time for state lawmakers. In addition to their legislative duties, there's an election to consider. Grisamore recently sent out an "urgent message" asking for campaign contributions.
"Fighting for individuals with disabilities — especially children — and their families is my highest priority," the e-mail began.
Grisamore then connected his request for money to the death of his daughter.
"This passion is driven by our 7th child, Rebekah, who died November 26th, 2002 from complications of Prader-Willi Syndrome at 11 months and 18 days." A picture of Rebekah appears at the top of the e-mail, along with Grisamore's head shot.
Prader-Willi syndrome is a genetic disorder characterized by obesity and decreased mental capacity and muscle tone. At birth, children who suffer from the condition appear small and floppy. An intense desire for food develops later, leading to excessive weight gain and associated health problems.
Rebekah suffocated after her body failed to digest a bottle of milk. Grisamore and his wife, Mary, arranged for her organs and tissue to be used for research. A feature story last month in The Kansas City Star explained that she was the only infant with Prader-Willi available for study.
Grisamore tells me that Rebekah's life and death inform a lot of what he tries to do in Jefferson City. A Bible-school graduate who is active in mission and nonprofit work, Grisamore says he wants to be an "advocate for the elderly," "a champion for children" and a "defender of the disabled." Grisamore says his daughter's plight "took [his] empathy and commitment for families with special needs to a whole new level."
Grisamore's commitment is admirable on its face. But at what point does his talking about his daughter become exploitive?
Last November, Grisamore wrote an "As I See It" piece for the Star stressing the importance of organ donation. The column began with a description of the Grisamore family weeping, praying and launching balloons at Rebekah's grave site.
The recent feature story about Rebekah's gift to science closed with Grisamore talking about organ-donation legislation he's trying to pass.
And then comes the fundraising letter.
"To continue my fight for the disabled and their families, I need to raise significant funds for my re-election this year," Grisamore writes.
Encouraging people to donate their organs is one thing. Using Rebekah's story to hustle for campaign cash seems to be quite another.
Grisamore tells me that he sent the message to four people who work with and on behalf of those with special needs. But with a boldface request that readers forward it, the e-mail was obviously intended for a wider audience.
He says he's trying to appeal to a base of the disabled and their families. What others might find crass he describes as an effort to build grass-roots support. "The reality of politics is that in order to be re-elected, you've got to raise money," he says.
A suburban evangelical and father of eight, Grisamore can surprise you. His coherent rejoinders to criticism on left-leaning blogs suggest a brand-name law degree, not matriculation at Trinity International University, a divinity school in Deerfield, Illinois. (Last fall, lawyer and Democrat Steve Bough lauded Grisamore for responding “thoughtfully, intelligently and professionally” to a post on Blog CCP that took Grisamore to task on a variety of issues, including his pay as a nonprofit executive.) Grisamore's gelled hair and five o'clock shadow bring to mind a raffish lobbyist more than a churchgoing Republican.
And unlike many conservatives, Grisamore believes that government can accomplish things.
He talks about a constitutional amendment to mandate spending for those with disabilities and special needs. "I'm here to create a revolution for these folks," he says.
But one advocate for autism awareness regards Grisamore with the mistrust that nonbelievers hold for televangelists.
Sherri Tucker, co-founder of the Lee’s Summit Autism Support Group, says Grisamore has refused to meet with her group unless the event is held in public and he takes credit for work that her group is doing.
"Everything he does is to further his political career," she says.
Tucker says she's also put off by the frequency with which Grisamore talks about Rebekah. She says he mentioned Rebekah at a rally for disability rights in Jefferson City last month.
Grisamore says he hopes that his family's experience can be an inspiration to others.
Grisamore tells me that he regrets having offended anyone with the letter. But given the chance to second-guess his decision to include Rebekah's story in a solicitation for donations, Grisamore says he would not have done anything differently.
"Rebekah is very much a part of all this," he tells me.
Still, Grisamore might be wise to consider the hell that some right-wing commentators have unleashed on other public figures who have lost children. Ann Coulter once suggested that because John Edwards spoke about his son Wade so much, he needed an "Ask me about my son's death in a horrific car accident" bumper sticker. Glenn Beck called grieving Iraq War mother Cindy Sheehan a "tragedy pimp."
These attack artists might not be the most mainstream Republicans. But they've undoubtedly helped members of Grisamore's party dominate many statehouses — where, collectively, they've made life tougher for the vulnerable people for whom Grisamore says he's fighting.
Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore uses the death of his infant daughter to ask for campaign cash
By David Martin
published: April 10, 2008
Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore wants to inspire others — and get re-elected.
Upon taking office last year, Missouri State Rep. Jeff Grisamore went to work for the vulnerable. The first bill he sponsored would have expanded the number of families eligible to receive child-care assistance.
Grisamore, a Lee's Summit Republican, didn't let party politics stand in the way of what he likes to call "responsible compassion." More than half of the bill's 56 co-sponsors were Democrats.
The bill died in committee, but Grisamore has continued to work on behalf of people who face adversity. Five of the 10 bills he has sponsored in this session concern the disabled.
Grisamore says the disabled and the mentally ill should receive the first portions of the state budget. "Instead, they end up having to fight for crumbs off the table," he tells me.
It's about 6 p.m., and Grisamore is sitting in a chair in his office at the Capitol, a Diet Coke within reach. The House has broken for dinner. With a long list of bills on the docket, Grisamore expects the workday to last until midnight.
This is a busy time for state lawmakers. In addition to their legislative duties, there's an election to consider. Grisamore recently sent out an "urgent message" asking for campaign contributions.
"Fighting for individuals with disabilities — especially children — and their families is my highest priority," the e-mail began.
Grisamore then connected his request for money to the death of his daughter.
"This passion is driven by our 7th child, Rebekah, who died November 26th, 2002 from complications of Prader-Willi Syndrome at 11 months and 18 days." A picture of Rebekah appears at the top of the e-mail, along with Grisamore's head shot.
Prader-Willi syndrome is a genetic disorder characterized by obesity and decreased mental capacity and muscle tone. At birth, children who suffer from the condition appear small and floppy. An intense desire for food develops later, leading to excessive weight gain and associated health problems.
Rebekah suffocated after her body failed to digest a bottle of milk. Grisamore and his wife, Mary, arranged for her organs and tissue to be used for research. A feature story last month in The Kansas City Star explained that she was the only infant with Prader-Willi available for study.
Grisamore tells me that Rebekah's life and death inform a lot of what he tries to do in Jefferson City. A Bible-school graduate who is active in mission and nonprofit work, Grisamore says he wants to be an "advocate for the elderly," "a champion for children" and a "defender of the disabled." Grisamore says his daughter's plight "took [his] empathy and commitment for families with special needs to a whole new level."
Grisamore's commitment is admirable on its face. But at what point does his talking about his daughter become exploitive?
Last November, Grisamore wrote an "As I See It" piece for the Star stressing the importance of organ donation. The column began with a description of the Grisamore family weeping, praying and launching balloons at Rebekah's grave site.
The recent feature story about Rebekah's gift to science closed with Grisamore talking about organ-donation legislation he's trying to pass.
And then comes the fundraising letter.
"To continue my fight for the disabled and their families, I need to raise significant funds for my re-election this year," Grisamore writes.
Encouraging people to donate their organs is one thing. Using Rebekah's story to hustle for campaign cash seems to be quite another.
Grisamore tells me that he sent the message to four people who work with and on behalf of those with special needs. But with a boldface request that readers forward it, the e-mail was obviously intended for a wider audience.
He says he's trying to appeal to a base of the disabled and their families. What others might find crass he describes as an effort to build grass-roots support. "The reality of politics is that in order to be re-elected, you've got to raise money," he says.
A suburban evangelical and father of eight, Grisamore can surprise you. His coherent rejoinders to criticism on left-leaning blogs suggest a brand-name law degree, not matriculation at Trinity International University, a divinity school in Deerfield, Illinois. (Last fall, lawyer and Democrat Steve Bough lauded Grisamore for responding “thoughtfully, intelligently and professionally” to a post on Blog CCP that took Grisamore to task on a variety of issues, including his pay as a nonprofit executive.) Grisamore's gelled hair and five o'clock shadow bring to mind a raffish lobbyist more than a churchgoing Republican.
And unlike many conservatives, Grisamore believes that government can accomplish things.
He talks about a constitutional amendment to mandate spending for those with disabilities and special needs. "I'm here to create a revolution for these folks," he says.
But one advocate for autism awareness regards Grisamore with the mistrust that nonbelievers hold for televangelists.
Sherri Tucker, co-founder of the Lee’s Summit Autism Support Group, says Grisamore has refused to meet with her group unless the event is held in public and he takes credit for work that her group is doing.
"Everything he does is to further his political career," she says.
Tucker says she's also put off by the frequency with which Grisamore talks about Rebekah. She says he mentioned Rebekah at a rally for disability rights in Jefferson City last month.
Grisamore says he hopes that his family's experience can be an inspiration to others.
Grisamore tells me that he regrets having offended anyone with the letter. But given the chance to second-guess his decision to include Rebekah's story in a solicitation for donations, Grisamore says he would not have done anything differently.
"Rebekah is very much a part of all this," he tells me.
Still, Grisamore might be wise to consider the hell that some right-wing commentators have unleashed on other public figures who have lost children. Ann Coulter once suggested that because John Edwards spoke about his son Wade so much, he needed an "Ask me about my son's death in a horrific car accident" bumper sticker. Glenn Beck called grieving Iraq War mother Cindy Sheehan a "tragedy pimp."
These attack artists might not be the most mainstream Republicans. But they've undoubtedly helped members of Grisamore's party dominate many statehouses — where, collectively, they've made life tougher for the vulnerable people for whom Grisamore says he's fighting.
The Voters Have Believed The Lies That Grisamore Spewed
Disappointed doesn't begin to describe it. Jeff Grisamore has literally made a living out of lying. He has never listed any occupation other than minister and charity work. He makes a six figure salary from his position in his charity. That is until he started using a "Christian" clearing house and no longer has to make public his donations. His charity also provided him with a car and a boat.
I have been told that his children receive free lunches and yet he insists that he understands the struggles of families. Really? How could you? You've never held a real job. You make money from a charity for widows and orphans. Your family has health insurance paid for by tax payers. Tax payers are paying for your children's lunches. And now you are having another child for the tax payers to support.
You reach out to families that have children with disabilities and tell them that you understand because you had a child with a disability. Prader Willi doesn't manifest itself until the child is older. You never had to fight a school district for services for your child. You have no idea what our families go through and how dare you suggest that you do. Your daughter's death was a terrible loss and I truly feel a great deal of sympathy for your family. However, don't use your child to make others believe that you understand their struggles. You don't have a clue.
You have lied, manipulated, and scammed honest families into supporting you. You tell them that you will be their voice. You raise their hopes. Then you do nothing. You lie and tell them what you think that they want to hear. You are good. But, you're not that good. You leave trails and intelligent people are finding them.
I'm so disappointed that your smear campaign and lies have once again netted you a place in Missouri politics. It just goes to show that voters do a poor job of finding out the truth about their candidates. Hopefully in two years they will do a better job. They won't have all of the big elections to think about and they might actually do their homework and find out that all is not what it seems.
I will continue to keep an eye on what is going on. I will continue to report on the issues that come up. I will not simply stand by and watch Jeff Grisamore lie and manipulate families so that he can work his way up the political ladder.
I have been told that his children receive free lunches and yet he insists that he understands the struggles of families. Really? How could you? You've never held a real job. You make money from a charity for widows and orphans. Your family has health insurance paid for by tax payers. Tax payers are paying for your children's lunches. And now you are having another child for the tax payers to support.
You reach out to families that have children with disabilities and tell them that you understand because you had a child with a disability. Prader Willi doesn't manifest itself until the child is older. You never had to fight a school district for services for your child. You have no idea what our families go through and how dare you suggest that you do. Your daughter's death was a terrible loss and I truly feel a great deal of sympathy for your family. However, don't use your child to make others believe that you understand their struggles. You don't have a clue.
You have lied, manipulated, and scammed honest families into supporting you. You tell them that you will be their voice. You raise their hopes. Then you do nothing. You lie and tell them what you think that they want to hear. You are good. But, you're not that good. You leave trails and intelligent people are finding them.
I'm so disappointed that your smear campaign and lies have once again netted you a place in Missouri politics. It just goes to show that voters do a poor job of finding out the truth about their candidates. Hopefully in two years they will do a better job. They won't have all of the big elections to think about and they might actually do their homework and find out that all is not what it seems.
I will continue to keep an eye on what is going on. I will continue to report on the issues that come up. I will not simply stand by and watch Jeff Grisamore lie and manipulate families so that he can work his way up the political ladder.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Bryce's Law
Bryce's LawWhat is Bryce's Law? This is a bill currently being considered in the Missouri legislature that creates the Missouri Special Needs Scholarship Tax Credit Program. (House Bill 1886 and Senate Bill SS/SCS/SBs 993 & 770) . Please play the quick video below from Representative Scharnhorst in which he shares why this bill is so important:
This program gives parents of special needs children with an IEP in a public school the choice to move their child to another public or private school using a special needs scholarship that will cover all or part of the costs as well as transportation to certain public schools.
Beginning with tax year 2008, a taxpayer would be able to claim a tax credit against a state tax liability equal to 80 percent of his/her contribution to a scholarship-granting organization. To read the current bill summary, click here
This bill is named after Bryce Scharnhorst (pictured above) who was the grandson of House Representative Dwight Scharnhorst. Bryce passed away last year from complications related to Autism and Epilepsy. Rep. Scharnhorst authored the House bill in Bryce's name because he recognized the education struggles that parents of special needs children face.
This program gives parents of special needs children with an IEP in a public school the choice to move their child to another public or private school using a special needs scholarship that will cover all or part of the costs as well as transportation to certain public schools.
Beginning with tax year 2008, a taxpayer would be able to claim a tax credit against a state tax liability equal to 80 percent of his/her contribution to a scholarship-granting organization. To read the current bill summary, click here
This bill is named after Bryce Scharnhorst (pictured above) who was the grandson of House Representative Dwight Scharnhorst. Bryce passed away last year from complications related to Autism and Epilepsy. Rep. Scharnhorst authored the House bill in Bryce's name because he recognized the education struggles that parents of special needs children face.
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Questions To Ask Jeff Grisamore
1. Are your children receiving free lunches?
2. Is is true that your wife is expecting again? Isn't Prader Willi a genetic disorder that is passed on from the father?
3. Did Bill Kenney pay for your house? Is is true that you don't have a mortgage?
4. Is is true that your charity is now going through a charity clearing house? Are there public records available to show what your charity revenues are and what salary you are being paid?
5. Did you vote against children with autism being able to go to a different school if their school was not doing it's job?
6. Have you demanded that the Lee's Summit school district start providing the services that children with special needs are federally guaranteed?
7. Did you ask to be on the Missouri Blue Ribbon Autism Panel and were told that NO Representatives were going to be on the Panel?
8. You stated that you were going to be on the Missouri Autism Commission. The list came out and you were not on it. Why not?
9. What is the name of the church that you were a minister at?
10. Have you ever worked for a public corporation? Does your resume only have charitable organizations for your employment?
11. Are you or have you received Medicaid for your family?
12. Did your charity provide your vehicle and boat? Are they still providing your vehicles?
2. Is is true that your wife is expecting again? Isn't Prader Willi a genetic disorder that is passed on from the father?
3. Did Bill Kenney pay for your house? Is is true that you don't have a mortgage?
4. Is is true that your charity is now going through a charity clearing house? Are there public records available to show what your charity revenues are and what salary you are being paid?
5. Did you vote against children with autism being able to go to a different school if their school was not doing it's job?
6. Have you demanded that the Lee's Summit school district start providing the services that children with special needs are federally guaranteed?
7. Did you ask to be on the Missouri Blue Ribbon Autism Panel and were told that NO Representatives were going to be on the Panel?
8. You stated that you were going to be on the Missouri Autism Commission. The list came out and you were not on it. Why not?
9. What is the name of the church that you were a minister at?
10. Have you ever worked for a public corporation? Does your resume only have charitable organizations for your employment?
11. Are you or have you received Medicaid for your family?
12. Did your charity provide your vehicle and boat? Are they still providing your vehicles?
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
JEFFERSON CITY, MO. (AP) -- Parents and educators pack a Capitol committee room for bills providing state aid for disabled students to switch schools.
JEFFERSON CITY, MO. (AP) -- Parents and educators pack a Capitol committee room for bills providing state aid for disabled students to switch schools.
Lawmakers are considering two proposals. One would provide state vouchers for public school students with mental disabilities to go to different public or private schools.
The other bill would provide state tax credits for donations to nonprofit groups that give scholarships for disabled students to attend other public or private schools.
Several parents of children with autism passionately pleaded for the bills during a Senate committee hearing Wednesday. They said children with special needs don't always get help from their local schools.
Several public school officials warned the bills could take money away from their schools.
(Copyright ©2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Lawmakers are considering two proposals. One would provide state vouchers for public school students with mental disabilities to go to different public or private schools.
The other bill would provide state tax credits for donations to nonprofit groups that give scholarships for disabled students to attend other public or private schools.
Several parents of children with autism passionately pleaded for the bills during a Senate committee hearing Wednesday. They said children with special needs don't always get help from their local schools.
Several public school officials warned the bills could take money away from their schools.
(Copyright ©2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Why We Needed The Scholarship Tax Credit
Talking Points for critical Special Needs Legislation: Missouri House Bill 1886
If a child receives early intervention, there is an 80% chance they will be able to return to mainstream public schools within 3-5 years.
Many parents, members of Missouri’s general assembly, various education and special needs organizations are supporting HB 1886.
The bill creates a scholarship tax credit program for the developmentally disabled.
Individuals and corporations would be able to receive an 80% tax credit for contributions into a special fund.
The dollars going into the fund would be made available to qualifying students to use as tuition reimbursement. Scholarships would be made available if an applicant meets certain criteria.
There are 130,000 students across Missouri with an IEP (individualized education plan).
A recent amendment to the bill has placed a cap of 10% of IEP students are eligible for the scholarship, in response to concerns that too many children leaving a school could make it hard to plan.
One of the goals of HB1886 is to remain as broad as possible to ensure that the scholarship fund effectively meets the needs of many students.
A report from the Governor’s Blue Ribbon Panel on Autism has lead to a call for action that requires the best, most innovative answers for families of developmentally disabled students.
Changes in public policies that support improved special needs education have won tremendous support in several states around the country. The success of the legislative efforts in Florida, Ohio and other states, along with the high degree of parent satisfaction with the improved education options that become available to them, has encouraged many people to unite around our legislative efforts right here in Missouri.
This legislation is especially important for families whose children want to stay in mainstream public schools, but who may need targeted, short-term intervention to help them catch up to their grade level.
News Alert: Governor Blunt has announced $175,000 in Youth Opportunities Program tax credits to Catholic Charities Community Services. This is significant in demonstrating that Missouri supports tax credits, administered by the Department of Economic Development, for private organizations committed to Missouri’s youth.
If a child receives early intervention, there is an 80% chance they will be able to return to mainstream public schools within 3-5 years.
Many parents, members of Missouri’s general assembly, various education and special needs organizations are supporting HB 1886.
The bill creates a scholarship tax credit program for the developmentally disabled.
Individuals and corporations would be able to receive an 80% tax credit for contributions into a special fund.
The dollars going into the fund would be made available to qualifying students to use as tuition reimbursement. Scholarships would be made available if an applicant meets certain criteria.
There are 130,000 students across Missouri with an IEP (individualized education plan).
A recent amendment to the bill has placed a cap of 10% of IEP students are eligible for the scholarship, in response to concerns that too many children leaving a school could make it hard to plan.
One of the goals of HB1886 is to remain as broad as possible to ensure that the scholarship fund effectively meets the needs of many students.
A report from the Governor’s Blue Ribbon Panel on Autism has lead to a call for action that requires the best, most innovative answers for families of developmentally disabled students.
Changes in public policies that support improved special needs education have won tremendous support in several states around the country. The success of the legislative efforts in Florida, Ohio and other states, along with the high degree of parent satisfaction with the improved education options that become available to them, has encouraged many people to unite around our legislative efforts right here in Missouri.
This legislation is especially important for families whose children want to stay in mainstream public schools, but who may need targeted, short-term intervention to help them catch up to their grade level.
News Alert: Governor Blunt has announced $175,000 in Youth Opportunities Program tax credits to Catholic Charities Community Services. This is significant in demonstrating that Missouri supports tax credits, administered by the Department of Economic Development, for private organizations committed to Missouri’s youth.
Special Needs Scholarship Tax Credits
Summary of the Introduced Bill
HB 1886 -- Special Needs Scholarship Tax Credits
Sponsor: Scharnhorst
Beginning January 1, 2008, this bill establishes Bryce's Law which authorizes a tax credit for an individual who donates to a scholarship-granting organization if the donation is not claimed on the taxpayer's federal income tax return. The tax credit may be taken against income tax, corporate franchise tax, insurance premium tax, financial institutions tax, and express company tax liability. The credit will be for 80% of the amount of the contribution but cannot exceed 50% of the taxpayer's state tax liability, up to $800,000 per year, and is nonrefundable but may be carried forward for four years or transferred or sold for between 75% and 100% of its par value.
Eligibility standards for students receiving scholarships are attendance at a public school with an individualized education plan. Scholarship-granting organizations must meet requirements for fiscal soundness, percentage of revenues devoted to educational scholarships, and public reporting. Private schools qualify to accept scholarship students by meeting specified requirements including employee background checks and providing data as requested, among others. Scholarships may also be used at a public school outside the student's resident school district. The bill specifies how scholarship checks will be distributed.
The Department of Economic Development must conduct a study to measure student achievement, satisfaction with the program, and its fiscal impact on the state and public schools and provide the General Assembly with a final copy of the evaluation by December 31, 2009. The department cannot use public money for the study and may contract with one or more qualified researchers who have previous experience evaluating similar programs.
The provisions of the bill will expire December 31 six years from the effective date.
Copyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri House of Representatives
94th General Assembly, 2nd Regular Session
Last Updated October 15, 2008 at 3:11 pm
HB 1886 -- Special Needs Scholarship Tax Credits
Sponsor: Scharnhorst
Beginning January 1, 2008, this bill establishes Bryce's Law which authorizes a tax credit for an individual who donates to a scholarship-granting organization if the donation is not claimed on the taxpayer's federal income tax return. The tax credit may be taken against income tax, corporate franchise tax, insurance premium tax, financial institutions tax, and express company tax liability. The credit will be for 80% of the amount of the contribution but cannot exceed 50% of the taxpayer's state tax liability, up to $800,000 per year, and is nonrefundable but may be carried forward for four years or transferred or sold for between 75% and 100% of its par value.
Eligibility standards for students receiving scholarships are attendance at a public school with an individualized education plan. Scholarship-granting organizations must meet requirements for fiscal soundness, percentage of revenues devoted to educational scholarships, and public reporting. Private schools qualify to accept scholarship students by meeting specified requirements including employee background checks and providing data as requested, among others. Scholarships may also be used at a public school outside the student's resident school district. The bill specifies how scholarship checks will be distributed.
The Department of Economic Development must conduct a study to measure student achievement, satisfaction with the program, and its fiscal impact on the state and public schools and provide the General Assembly with a final copy of the evaluation by December 31, 2009. The department cannot use public money for the study and may contract with one or more qualified researchers who have previous experience evaluating similar programs.
The provisions of the bill will expire December 31 six years from the effective date.
Copyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri House of Representatives
94th General Assembly, 2nd Regular Session
Last Updated October 15, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Monday, October 20, 2008
Grisamore Claims He "Knows More Than Anyone About Struggles Facing Families"
Republican Grisamore Claims He "Knows More Than Anyone About Struggles Facing Families" Despite His Big Salary
http://kcblueblog.blogspot.com/search?q=grisamore
http://kcblueblog.blogspot.com/search?q=grisamore
What They Really Voted Against/Children With Autism Receiving An Appropriate Education
Grisamore goes around saying that he is the best that the state has to offer for families affected by autism. But, he and his Republican buddies voted against a bill that would have given families affected by autism the choice of schools when their schools were unable or unwilling to provide the services that are needed.
Republicans Kraus, Grisamore and Yates have voted against their party on that issue during the last session.
They said they feared what would happen if "open enrollment" allowed Kansas City students to attend Lee's Summit schools.
Yates said if students from Kansas City were allowed to attend Lee's Summit schools, it would "reduce our quality of education in the suburbs."
Turk cautioned his Republican colleagues not to carry that idea too far.
"The kids in Kansas City are our kids too," Turk said.
He said parents should get vouchers to send their children to another school if theirs is not performing - but only to another school in the same district.
Yates said education was about more than money.
"We have spent lots of money in the Kansas City School District with no results," he said.
Grisamore told the Tribune that "One aspect of the bill that was "lost to compromise," Grisamore said, "were tax credits for parents to send their children to another school if their local public school wasn't able to provide an adequate education."
"We couldn't find common ground between the public educators and the school-of-choice folks," Grisamore said.
Grisamore said some lawmakers were nervous about the potential of public funding going to private schools.
What he didn't say is that he voted no on a bill that would have allowed our children the right to go to a school that could provide them services if our school wasn't. That is why the Board and District are endorsing him.
Republicans Kraus, Grisamore and Yates have voted against their party on that issue during the last session.
They said they feared what would happen if "open enrollment" allowed Kansas City students to attend Lee's Summit schools.
Yates said if students from Kansas City were allowed to attend Lee's Summit schools, it would "reduce our quality of education in the suburbs."
Turk cautioned his Republican colleagues not to carry that idea too far.
"The kids in Kansas City are our kids too," Turk said.
He said parents should get vouchers to send their children to another school if theirs is not performing - but only to another school in the same district.
Yates said education was about more than money.
"We have spent lots of money in the Kansas City School District with no results," he said.
Grisamore told the Tribune that "One aspect of the bill that was "lost to compromise," Grisamore said, "were tax credits for parents to send their children to another school if their local public school wasn't able to provide an adequate education."
"We couldn't find common ground between the public educators and the school-of-choice folks," Grisamore said.
Grisamore said some lawmakers were nervous about the potential of public funding going to private schools.
What he didn't say is that he voted no on a bill that would have allowed our children the right to go to a school that could provide them services if our school wasn't. That is why the Board and District are endorsing him.
Candidate's Forum And Why Children's Healthcare Is Not Important
Medicaid
In 2005, Missouri made substantial changes to the Medicaid system. The program evolved into Missouri Healthnet last year, but voters at the panel were still concerned with the state of Medicaid in Missouri. “In 2004-05 Medicaid expenditures outpaced education expenditures in Missouri. It was a serious concern,” Grisamore said.
Grisamore said in order to fight for education and protect education in the Lee’s Summit area, the General Assembly had to make some cuts in Medicaid.
“One area I did not agree with was the depth of the Medicaid cuts as they affected our most vulnerable citizens — children, seniors and those with disabilities,” Grisamore said.
But Grisamore said the new Missouri Healthnet is offering greater efficiencies and savings since it was enacted. “A lot has been done, but there is a lot more that needs to be done,” he said. “We need to reduce fraud, misuse and abuse and make sure our most vulnerable citizens are covered.”
Grisamore’s opponent, Norbury, said its not all about user fraud, there is provider fraud that goes on too. “Doctors abuse the system too,” Norbury said. “There was no venture enacted to reduce provider fraud.” Additionally, Norbury said Medicaid needs incentives for people to improve their health. “We need to incentivize people to be healthy — as opposed to not sick,” he said.
Kraus said Missouri needs to cut growth by looking at ways to make healthcare more efficient, which would reduce the cost overall and make sure everyone gets re-certified for Medicaid.
“As people learn the system, they’ll find ways to get around it,” Kraus said. “So we need to keep changing the system.”
Yates said the key to Medicaid reformation is helping its recipients “take ownership for their well-being.” “Why should my taxes pay for the full-coverage of smokers,” Yates said. “We need to be encouraging and educating people to make choices and lead a healthier life.”
Yates also said the use of technology would increase the efficiency in the state’s healthcare system. The new Missouri Healthnet is an entirely Web-based system.
LeVota, the current minority leader of the Missouri House, said the state needs to reinstate the cuts of 2005. “We were in a deficit, but other states focused on coverage. Missouri made cuts,” LeVota said. “Now supposedly there is a surplus. Well that $600 million in surplus is on the backs of the sick.”
LeVota also proposed creating a healthcare policy board and making sure children are insured.
“They are the least expensive to cover and it’s a lot less expensive in the long run and it’s the right thing to do,” he said.
Education
LeVota said in the state government funds for education and healthcare are often competing. But he said it doesn’t have to be an either-or decision.
“We can figure out a way to have great education and great healthcare,” LeVota said. Norbury said funding education is a question of priority.
“We have to want to fund both,” he said. “So let’s focus on the future, which is our children, and have good education and good healthcare.”
But Yates, Kraus and Grisamore said the key to quality education is not all about money. “Look at the Kansas City School District,” Yates said. “We’ve poured money in there and still have gotten no results.”
Yates said the state needs to look at the funding formula, because the current one is unfair to performing districts like Lee’s Summit. “We fund those who do not perform and do not pay their fair share and they have an incentive to remain the same,” Yates said.
Kraus said he proposed a bill last session that would have put term limits on school board members of failing school districts.
“Money is not always the solution for results,” he said.
Grisamore said the state needs to give more credit to growing and performing districts like Lee’s Summit and not penalize them.
“We need to encourage parental involvement. We need to give incentives to teachers. We need to do everything we can to back-up our teachers and our school districts,” Grisamore said.
In 2005, Missouri made substantial changes to the Medicaid system. The program evolved into Missouri Healthnet last year, but voters at the panel were still concerned with the state of Medicaid in Missouri. “In 2004-05 Medicaid expenditures outpaced education expenditures in Missouri. It was a serious concern,” Grisamore said.
Grisamore said in order to fight for education and protect education in the Lee’s Summit area, the General Assembly had to make some cuts in Medicaid.
“One area I did not agree with was the depth of the Medicaid cuts as they affected our most vulnerable citizens — children, seniors and those with disabilities,” Grisamore said.
But Grisamore said the new Missouri Healthnet is offering greater efficiencies and savings since it was enacted. “A lot has been done, but there is a lot more that needs to be done,” he said. “We need to reduce fraud, misuse and abuse and make sure our most vulnerable citizens are covered.”
Grisamore’s opponent, Norbury, said its not all about user fraud, there is provider fraud that goes on too. “Doctors abuse the system too,” Norbury said. “There was no venture enacted to reduce provider fraud.” Additionally, Norbury said Medicaid needs incentives for people to improve their health. “We need to incentivize people to be healthy — as opposed to not sick,” he said.
Kraus said Missouri needs to cut growth by looking at ways to make healthcare more efficient, which would reduce the cost overall and make sure everyone gets re-certified for Medicaid.
“As people learn the system, they’ll find ways to get around it,” Kraus said. “So we need to keep changing the system.”
Yates said the key to Medicaid reformation is helping its recipients “take ownership for their well-being.” “Why should my taxes pay for the full-coverage of smokers,” Yates said. “We need to be encouraging and educating people to make choices and lead a healthier life.”
Yates also said the use of technology would increase the efficiency in the state’s healthcare system. The new Missouri Healthnet is an entirely Web-based system.
LeVota, the current minority leader of the Missouri House, said the state needs to reinstate the cuts of 2005. “We were in a deficit, but other states focused on coverage. Missouri made cuts,” LeVota said. “Now supposedly there is a surplus. Well that $600 million in surplus is on the backs of the sick.”
LeVota also proposed creating a healthcare policy board and making sure children are insured.
“They are the least expensive to cover and it’s a lot less expensive in the long run and it’s the right thing to do,” he said.
Education
LeVota said in the state government funds for education and healthcare are often competing. But he said it doesn’t have to be an either-or decision.
“We can figure out a way to have great education and great healthcare,” LeVota said. Norbury said funding education is a question of priority.
“We have to want to fund both,” he said. “So let’s focus on the future, which is our children, and have good education and good healthcare.”
But Yates, Kraus and Grisamore said the key to quality education is not all about money. “Look at the Kansas City School District,” Yates said. “We’ve poured money in there and still have gotten no results.”
Yates said the state needs to look at the funding formula, because the current one is unfair to performing districts like Lee’s Summit. “We fund those who do not perform and do not pay their fair share and they have an incentive to remain the same,” Yates said.
Kraus said he proposed a bill last session that would have put term limits on school board members of failing school districts.
“Money is not always the solution for results,” he said.
Grisamore said the state needs to give more credit to growing and performing districts like Lee’s Summit and not penalize them.
“We need to encourage parental involvement. We need to give incentives to teachers. We need to do everything we can to back-up our teachers and our school districts,” Grisamore said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)